Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

Introduction

This document outlines the plan for reviewing and refactoring the test cases imported from IDA 4 to IDA 5. The goal is to ensure that all test cases are accurate, relevant, and aligned with the current state of the software. This refactoring process will involve verifying existing test cases, modifying them as necessary, and updating relevant documentation.

Objectives

  • Review and verify the existing test cases imported from IDA 4.

  • Refactor test cases as needed to ensure they reflect the current functionality of IDA 5.

  • Update comments in the ticket to document the changes.

  • Ensure that test cases remain effective and efficient throughout the sprint cycle.

Plan Overview

The test case refactoring will be approached in two potential ways:

  1. Parallel Refactoring: Conduct the refactoring process alongside the ongoing sprint features, allowing the team to progress on both fronts simultaneously.

  2. Dedicated Sprints: Allocate two sprints exclusively for test case refactoring, involving all four team members to expedite the process.

Detailed Plan

Step 1: Review Existing Test Cases

  • Scope: Go through all the test cases imported from IDA 4.

  • Verification: Determine if each test case requires refactoring based on changes in IDA 5.

Step 2: Refactor Test Cases

Criteria for Refactoring:

  • Modification of Existing Features: If an existing feature has been modified, update the existing test cases instead of creating new ones.

  • Deprecation of Features: If an existing feature is no longer valid, mark the corresponding test cases as deprecated.

  • Addition of New Features: For new features added to IDA 5, create new test cases within the test set.

Step 3: Update Documentation

  • Comments in Tickets: Document all changes made to the test cases by updating the comments in the respective tickets.

  • Test Case Documentation: Ensure that all test cases have up-to-date descriptions, steps, expected results, and relevant comments.

Execution Plan

Option 1: Parallel Refactoring with Sprint Features

  • Integration with Sprints: Perform test case refactoring as part of the ongoing sprint activities.

  • Time Allocation: Allocate specific time blocks within each sprint for test case review and refactoring.

  • Resource Management: Ensure balanced distribution of team members between feature development and test case refactoring.

Option 2: Dedicated Sprints for Refactoring

  • Sprint Planning: Allocate two consecutive sprints exclusively for the test case refactoring process.

  • Full Team Involvement: Engage all four team members in the refactoring tasks to maximize efficiency and speed.

  • Focused Effort: Allow uninterrupted focus on reviewing, modifying, and updating test cases.

Post-Refactoring Steps

  • Validation: Ensure all refactored test cases are reviewed for accuracy and completeness.

  • Integration: Integrate the updated test cases into the continuous testing.

  • Monitoring: Continuously monitor the effectiveness of the refactored test cases and make adjustments as necessary.

Conclusion

This plan aims to ensure that the test cases for IDA 5 are thoroughly reviewed, accurately reflect the current state of the software, and are well-documented. By choosing between parallel refactoring or dedicated sprints, we can maintain a flexible approach that aligns with our project timelines and resource availability. Post-refactoring, ongoing maintenance and updates will be crucial to sustaining the quality and relevance of our manual testing efforts.

  • No labels